Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Parameters of external, individual and inter-relational resources of psychotherapists at T1, T2, T3 and T4: cross-sectional samples

From: Course of mental distress among psychotherapists throughout two years of the COVID- 19 pandemic: individual and inter-relational resources make a difference—cross-sectional and longitudinal results of the VOICE study

  1. SOC = sense of coherence; ESSI-D = ENRICHD Social Support Inventory; significant p-values are marked: *: = p ≤.050, **: = p ≤.010, ***: = p ≤.001; Bonferroni correction: p ≤.050/4 (.013) for four score variables with means: PHQ- 2 score, general optimism, SOC, ESSI-D and p ≤.050/7 (.007) for seven categorial variables (PHQ- 2 rate + 6 resource variables); PHQ- 2 = separate module of the PHQ- 4 = Patient Health Questionnaire- 4, assessing depression; cut off (PHQ- 2 score) for clinically relevant depression: ≥ 3; T1, T2, T3, T4 = time point 1, 2, 3 and 4; “-“: not assessed at this time point
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us